Even though D-Link expressly promised that many of its wireless devices had the highest level of security available, the Federal Trade Commission last month filed a lawsuit that alleges otherwise…
Again this last year phishing lead the charge in most data breaches. According to the latest phishme “2016 Enterprise Phishing Susceptibility and Resiliency Report” 91% of data breaches begin with spearphishing. This is supported by the 2016 Verizon Data Breach Report.
Both companies warn that phishing attacks are a significant threat, potentially the most significant.
Unfortunately there are not great technological solutions to prevent phishing. Spam tools or anti-virus may help, but phishers continually evolve their messages and approaches.
Training, in my opinion, is still the best way to prevent phishing or any type of social engineering. Through targeted training and testing, organizations have the ability to reduce a persistent threat
Computerweekly.com has an interesting post on federal government security classifications and cloud provisioning. The TLDR is that many federal agencies are paying too much, because they are classifying information incorrectly and vendors are happy to upsell protections.
In my experience in state government, the problem is very different. To begin with few agencies have strong data classification policies. In Texas, the Department of Information Resources published a data classification template that agencies can use to develop a classification scheme. Personally, I think the template (and associate white paper) is a marvelous piece of work :). It is unclear how many actually used the template, though.
The problem isn’t limited to Texas. Based on discussion with the CISOs from other states, data classification is a difficult problem for many.
The issue raised is how to determine the appropriate protections for data when classification programs don’t exist. The result is agencies will either over protect public data or under protect sensitive data. Several states have a de facto policy of requiring all data to be hosted in the continental United States (conus). While this is appealing, it also drives up prices for cloud services.
Many of the regulations that affect states (most recently CJIS) have dropped the conus requirements. Requiring conus storage for “public” data is probably not the best use of taxpayer money. Without a strong data classification program, though, it is hard to make informed decisions.
In a recent speech at the Usenix Enigma security conference, the technical director of the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre, Dr. Ian Levy, stated that security companies are overstating the abilities of malicious attackers. To anyone that has
- worked in the security world for any significant amount of time and
- has ever met a sales person
this should not be surprising news. Not only do vendors like to sell their “magic bullet” for security, many sell the “boogieman” of the über 1337 hacker. With such skilled and relentless attackers, you are crazy to not buy their product or service.
There are some amazingly skilled hackers in the world and virtually nothing will stop them cold, definitely not a single product. Real security is based around a layered security architecture (aka Defense in Depth) with multiple products, procedures, and processes mitigating the shortcomings of each of the other layers.
How many layers? That really depends on the classification of the data you are trying to protect, not the boogieman that you are being sold.
For more to the story, check out the BBC story.